Stack Runway
← Learning Center

Borrowing versus selling Bitcoin: compare the same cash need

See the BTC you keep and how a dollar loan balance translates into BTC at different prices.

Give both paths the same job

Suppose you hold 1 BTC, Bitcoin is assumed to be $100,000, and you need $20,000 of cash. Selling 0.2 BTC provides that cash and leaves 0.8 BTC. Borrowing $20,000 provides the same cash while retaining 1 BTC, but creates a $20,000 liability and collateral obligations.

You keep 1 BTC until you sell or lose collateral

In this example, selling leaves you with 0.8 BTC. Borrowing leaves you with 1 BTC and a dollar debt. A change in Bitcoin’s price does not change those BTC holdings. The borrower keeps an extra 0.2 BTC compared with the seller, as long as no BTC is sold or liquidated.

The debt can become smaller in BTC terms

A $20,000 debt equals 0.2 BTC at $100,000 per BTC. At a hypothetical $1,000,000 per BTC, the same $20,000 equals 0.02 BTC. The dollar debt has not fallen. It represents a smaller fraction of your 1 BTC.

Interest increases the dollar balance. With 10% interest added over one year and no repayments or new borrowing, you owe $22,000. At $1,000,000 per BTC, that balance equals 0.022 BTC. Your holdings remain 1 BTC; converting debt into BTC does not repay it.

A higher modeled price is an assumption

Debt shrinks in BTC terms only when the BTC price rises faster than the debt grows. If the price falls, the same dollar debt represents more BTC. A power-law floor price used in a model is an assumed price path, not a guaranteed minimum market price.

Holdings and net value answer different questions

BTC held tells you how much Bitcoin you own. Subtracting the debt’s BTC equivalent gives a debt-adjusted value for comparison with selling. For example, 1 BTC minus a 0.022 BTC debt equivalent is 0.978 BTC of net value, not a reduction of your holdings to 0.978 BTC. If you actually sold BTC to repay the loan, your holdings would then decrease. Repaying from other funds would not require that sale.

The missing costs still matter

This simplified comparison excludes taxes, fees, spreads, sale limits, changing rates, and liquidation. Borrowing also creates collateral and repayment obligations. Selling can have tax consequences depending on your situation, which this example does not calculate. Neither path is presented as the better choice for every person.

Get $20,000 cash: sell BTC or borrow?

Start with 1 BTC worth $100,000. You want $20,000 cash to spend today. Both paths provide that same cash.

If you sell

Sell 0.2 BTC for $20,000.

Keep 0.8 BTC

No loan balance.

If you borrow

Borrow $20,000 instead of selling.

Keep 1 BTC

You owe $20,000, plus interest.

Borrowing keeps an extra 0.2 BTC in your stack. But you still have a loan to repay.

Same BTC held. Different debt equivalent.

After one year with 10% interest and no repayments or further borrowing, the loan balance is $22,000. Compare that same balance at four hypothetical prices.

The borrower still holds 1 BTC in every row.
Assumed BTC price BTC held: sell / borrow $22,000 debt in BTC terms
$80,0000.8 / 1 BTC0.275 BTC
$100,0000.8 / 1 BTC0.22 BTC
$200,0000.8 / 1 BTC0.11 BTC
$1,000,0000.8 / 1 BTC0.022 BTC

Debt in BTC terms = dollar balance ÷ BTC price. At $1,000,000 per BTC, $22,000 ÷ $1,000,000 = 0.022 BTC. Without interest, the original $20,000 would equal 0.02 BTC.

You still owe the dollars. A smaller BTC equivalent does not cancel the loan or make repayment automatic. These prices are illustrations, not a forecast or a timeline.

No BTC sale, repayment, or liquidation takes place in this table. Taxes and fees are excluded. Borrowing carries collateral risk; the extra BTC held alone does not establish which path is better.

Open Loan vs. Sell →

This is a worked example. Opening the planner does not transfer these assumptions.